Earned media value (EMV) is views ÷ 1,000 × a CPM: what the same views would have cost as ads. A TikTok with 100,000 views is worth $408 at $4.08, the median TikTok ad CPM across the ecommerce brands in Triple Whale's TikTok benchmarks, and $1,506 at $15.06, the median in its Meta benchmarks, both for August 2025 to July 2026. The median TikTok got 866 views, which is $3.53 of EMV.
The CPM you pick decides most of the answer: the same views are worth 3.7 times as much at the Meta benchmark as at the TikTok one. That is one reason AMEC, the international association for communication measurement, lists EMV among the metrics that should not be used. If you pay creators per view, you already have a better number: your own cost per 1,000 views. On live UGC jobs on viral.app, the median rate is $1.
How do you calculate earned media value?
Divide a video's views by 1,000 and multiply by the CPM (cost per 1,000 impressions) you would have paid for ads on the same platform. Do it per video, then add the videos up.
EMV = (views ÷ 1,000) × CPM
A Reel with 250,000 views at the $15.06 Meta benchmark CPM: 250 × $15.06 = $3,765.
EMV calculator: lookup table from views to dollars
Find your view count below, or multiply views by the CPM and divide by 1,000. The labeled rows are real thresholds from the videos we track, from our viral benchmarks.
- Most videos are worth a few dollars. Half of all TikToks have an EMV under $3.53 at the $4.08 TikTok benchmark. Half the Reels are under $22.79 at the $15.06 Meta benchmark.
- Use the median, not the average. The average TikTok got 57,879 views, 67 times the median. At the $4.08 benchmark, an "average EMV per post" of $236 describes almost no post.
- Each CPM column rescales every row. Moving from the TikTok benchmark to the Meta one multiplies every row by 3.7, and Meta's priciest industry adds another 45%.
Four steps to an EMV you can defend
Count views per video
Use each platform's public view count and note the date. Wait 30 days if you can: TikToks that passed a million views had only 63% of their 30-day views after one week.
Pick one CPM per platform
Take it from your own ad account for the same platform, country and months. Without ads, use a dated public benchmark and name it.
Multiply and add up
Views divided by 1,000, times the CPM, per video. Use the platform's CPM for that platform's views.
Report the inputs with the total
Write the CPM, its source and its date next to the EMV. Leave out multipliers, or state them.
Some guides add a multiplier for quality or trust. Meltwater's formula (March 2026) multiplies by an optional "quality factor". A multiplier makes the number bigger without new data, so keep it out of anything you report to finance.
How to calculate earned media impressions on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube
For short-form video, use views as the impression count. Meta and YouTube count a view when a video starts to play or is displayed, which is close to the event an ad impression measures. The differences are replays and unique people. We found no TikTok help page that defines an organic view, so treat TikTok's public counts the same way.
Views overstate the number of people reached. Meta's "Viewers" metric counts unique accounts, but only the account owner can see it. For EMV, views are the right input anyway: CPM ads are bought per impression, not per person. Two traps: don't add reach and views together, and check cross-posts. Instagram shows combined Instagram and Facebook views for a Reel that is also shared to Facebook, so adding the Facebook count on top counts those views twice.
Which CPM should you use for EMV?
Use the CPM from your own ad account on the same platform, in the same countries and months. If you don't run ads, use a public benchmark with a date and a sample size, and say which one.
- Match the platform. Value TikTok views at a TikTok CPM and Reels at a Meta CPM. Pricing TikTok views at the Meta median multiplies the EMV by 3.7.
- Match the period. CPMs moved fast in one year. Last year's TikTok median of $5.71 would overstate this year's TikTok EMV by 40%.
- Match the buyer. Triple Whale's sample is ecommerce brands. If you sell an app or a B2B product, your own Ads Manager numbers fit better.
- YouTube Shorts: we found no public YouTube CPM benchmark we could verify. Use the CPM of your own Google Ads video campaigns, or leave Shorts out of the EMV total and say so.
Engagement-weighted EMV: how Instagram EMV tools calculate it
Most tools price each like, comment and share instead of, or on top of, the views. They rarely publish the prices. Later (May 2025) uses daily benchmark values for likes, comments, shares, clicks and impressions without listing them, and HypeAuditor does not disclose its coefficients either.
EMV = likes × value per like + comments × value per comment + shares × value per share
Sprout Social's example (November 2024) uses $0.50 per engagement, weighted 1 for a like, 2 for a comment and 3 for a share. We applied those illustrative prices to 100,000 views at each platform's median engagement rates:
| US dollars | |
|---|---|
| Creator pay at $1 CPM | 100 |
| TikTok ad CPM | 408 |
| Meta ad CPM | 1,506 |
| Engagement-weighted | 2,657 |
| Views plus engagement | 3,065 |
- The method decides which platform wins. On TikTok, engagement pricing gives 6.5 times the view-based EMV. On Reels and Facebook it gives less.
- TikTok viewers like more. The median TikTok got 47 likes per 1,000 views, against 18 on Reels and 8 on Facebook, where viral.app counts all reactions as likes. At any price per like, a TikTok earns 2.7 times a Reel's like value for the same views.
- Views plus engagement counts twice. An ad CPM already pays for the impression, and the likes come with it. Adding both, as hybrid models do, turns $408 of TikTok ad cost into $3,065.
Why is EMV controversial?
The PR measurement industry rejected the method behind EMV years ago, and influencer measurement firms such as Traackr now say the same about EMV itself.
- AMEC calls it invalid. Principle 5 of the Barcelona Principles 4.0 (June 2025) says advertising value equivalents "should not be used". Its guidance names EMV as a variant of the same metric. If you still report one, AMEC says not to call it "value", "impact" or "ROI", and to disclose any multipliers.
- The UK's PR institute called it unprofessional. The CIPR announced in May 2017 that members using AVEs would get one year to switch to valid metrics, then face possible disciplinary action.
- Influencer firms object too. Traackr's chief customer officer Nicolas Chabot called EMV "imaginary, fictitious and not auditable" in an interview with The Daily Influence (November 2025).
- Two tools give two answers. Per-engagement prices are proprietary, so the same post gets different EMVs in Later, HypeAuditor or a spreadsheet. HypeAuditor's own page names the lack of a consistent calculation as EMV's biggest drawback.
Our data shows another problem: a few videos make up most of any EMV total.
| Top 1% of videos | Top 10% of videos | |
|---|---|---|
| TikTok | 76.5% | 97.2% |
| Instagram Reels | 71.8% | 96.1% |
| Facebook videos | 63.1% | 94.1% |
EMV is views times a constant, so it follows the same split. The bottom half of all TikToks held 0.34% of TikTok views. A handful of breakouts can make up most of a quarter's EMV. Our German politics short-form report found the same in 2025: the top 1% of videos took 49% of the views. That makes EMV a poor way to compare creators or months.
EMV vs what you actually pay creators per view
If you pay creators per 1,000 views, compare your cost per 1,000 views with the ad CPM directly. That is the same comparison EMV makes, without calling ad cost "value".
On live UGC jobs on viral.app, the median CPM rate is $1 per 1,000 views, and the middle half of brands pay $1 to $1.30 (UGC rates, October 2026, each brand counted once).
- With a flat CPM payout, EMV "ROI" is a constant. EMV divided by payout equals the ad CPM divided by your CPM; the views cancel out. At $1 per 1,000 views, every video returns 4.1x against TikTok ads and 15.1x against Meta ads, whether it got 300 views or 3 million. It cannot tell you which video or creator worked. Tiers, base fees and caps make the ratio vary, but it still reflects your pay terms more than the video.
- With a fixed fee, the ratio swings with views. The median live job pays $15 per video. A median TikTok (866 views, $3.53 EMV) returns 0.24x. A top-10% TikTok (18,240 views, $74) returns 5x. A 100,000-view TikTok returns 27x.
- For a whole program, the CPM choice sets the return. The month-one model in our sub-$1 CPM UGC playbook buys 7.2M views from 600 videos for $6,320 including overhead, or $0.88 per 1,000 views. EMV calls that $29,376 at the TikTok benchmark or $108,432 at the Meta one: a 4.6x or 17x "return" for the same program.
A finance team can audit a sentence like: we bought 7.2M views at $0.88 per 1,000 when TikTok ads cost $4.08. viral.app does not calculate EMV. Creator Hub shows each campaign's effective CPM and paid CPM, which divide payouts by campaign views once a campaign has 1,000 views. Performance-based creator payments set the rate per 1,000 views, with optional tiers and caps.
What to report instead of EMV
If leadership asks for EMV, give it, labeled as ad cost equivalent, with the CPM source and date. Put these next to it:
- Cost per 1,000 views for creator content, against the CPM you pay for ads on the same platform.
- Views against each creator's median. Our viral benchmarks show about 1 in 20 videos gets 10 times its account's median.
- Outcomes: installs, sign-ups, sales or discount-code redemptions. Our guide to the ROI of influencer marketing covers how to connect them.
- A report format that stays the same every month, so changes reflect performance, not a new CPM. See social media campaign reporting.
How we measured
- Videos: about 3 million public short-form videos posted between October 1, 2025 and August 31, 2026 by about 77,000 accounts tracked in viral.app: 1.4M TikTok videos (photo slideshows left out), 1.2M Instagram Reels, about 240,000 YouTube Shorts and about 93,000 Facebook videos. Views and engagement are as of early October 2026. We count YouTube videos up to three minutes long as Shorts.
- Who the accounts are: brands, agencies and creators add the accounts they want to track, such as their own, their creators' and their competitors'.
- Engagement rates: medians per 1,000 views over videos with at least 1,000 views. YouTube does not publish share counts. Facebook likes are all reactions combined. Instagram saves are missing for most videos, so we left saves out.
- View concentration: with the 10 largest accounts on each platform removed, the top 1% of videos still held 72.5% of TikTok views, 65.4% of Reels views and 55.8% of Facebook views. We left YouTube out of that chart because 10 channels hold 86% of the Shorts views in our data.
- CPMs and engagement prices are not ours. They come from the dated public sources linked above.
- Creator pay rates come from live jobs on viral.app, read on October 2, 2026.
Frequently asked questions
Compare your creator CPM with your ad CPM
The number that holds up in a budget meeting is what you paid per 1,000 views. Create a viral.app account to track your creators' videos and see the effective CPM of every creator campaign.


